ATI Radeon VE vs GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1094not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.27no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGK107Rage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 February 2013 (11 years ago)19 February 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed745 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate23.840.55
Floating-point processing power0.5722 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs323

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth40 GB/s2.928 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 February 2013 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 23 Watt

GT 640M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI VE, on the other hand, has 39.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition and Radeon VE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a notebook card while Radeon VE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
ATI Radeon VE
Radeon VE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate Radeon VE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.