GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated270
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Power efficiencyno data28.12
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK208TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 May 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed902 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors915 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8695.04
Floating-point processing power0.6927 TFLOPS3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length115 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.140
CUDA3.57.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 May 2013 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 50 Watt

GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 has 100% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1643 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.