Arctic Sound-M vs GeForce GT 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1109not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.41no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGF108Arctic Sound
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2012 (12 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$39.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores968192
Core clock speed700 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors585 million8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt500 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.20230.4
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS14.75 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Height2.7" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GB/s1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1.23 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGANo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 500 Watt

GT 620 has 920.4% lower power consumption.

Arctic Sound-M, on the other hand, has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 620 and Arctic Sound-M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 620 is a desktop card while Arctic Sound-M is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
GeForce GT 620
Intel Arctic Sound-M
Arctic Sound-M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 415 votes

Rate GeForce GT 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arctic Sound-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.