GeForce2 MX 400 vs GeForce GT 520M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1168 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Celsius (1999−2005) |
| GPU code name | N12P-GP/LV | NV11 B2 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 3 March 2001 (23 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | no data |
| CUDA cores | 48 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 740 / 600 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 585 million | 20 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 5.376 | 0.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 0.129 gflops | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 4x |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | SDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 166 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 2.656 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 API | 7.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 January 2011 | 3 March 2001 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 32 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 180 nm |
GT 520M has an age advantage of 9 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520M and GeForce2 MX 400. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 520M is a notebook card while GeForce2 MX 400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
