Radeon RX 6800 XT vs GeForce GT 445M

Place in the ranking	869	28
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	50.48
Power efficiency	4.15	14.98
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GF106	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	3 September 2010 (14 years ago)	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	144	4608
Core clock speed	590 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	1,170 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	14.16	648.0
Floating-point processing power	0.3398 TFLOPS	20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	128
TMUs	24	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	60.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 445M 2.10

RX 6800 XT 64.92
+2991%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 445M 811

RX 6800 XT 25045
+2988%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 445M 1148

RX 6800 XT 52046
+4434%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 445M 5249

RX 6800 XT 96516
+1739%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	19 −2795%	550−600 +2795%
Full HD	32 −538%	204 +538%
1440p	4−5 −3500%	144 +3500%
4K	3−4 −3000%	93 +3000%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.18
1440p	no data	4.51
4K	no data	6.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−2400%

120−130
+2400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −1814%	130−140 +1814%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −10200%	200−210 +10200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1833%	110−120 +1833%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −2400%	120−130 +2400%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3733%	110−120 +3733%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −3040%	150−160 +3040%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −2489%	230−240 +2489%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1786%	132 +1786%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −1233%	240−250 +1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2950%	122 +2950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −2580%	260−270 +2580%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −758%	309 +758%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −1814%	130−140 +1814%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −10200%	200−210 +10200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1833%	110−120 +1833%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −2400%	120−130 +2400%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3733%	110−120 +3733%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −3040%	150−160 +3040%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −2489%	230−240 +2489%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1843%	136 +1843%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −1233%	240−250 +1233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2875%	110−120 +2875%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −3450%	355 +3450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1042%	130−140 +1042%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −758%	309 +758%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −1814%	130−140 +1814%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1833%	110−120 +1833%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −2400%	120−130 +2400%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3733%	110−120 +3733%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −2489%	230−240 +2489%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1643%	122 +1643%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −1450%	279 +1450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −2920%	302 +2920%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1233%	160 +1233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −211%	112 +211%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−2900%

120
+2900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −4867%	140−150 +4867%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −3300%	100−110 +3300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −3650%	75−80 +3650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −7500%	75−80 +7500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −6500%	65−70 +6500%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −3700%	75−80 +3700%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1529%	114 +1529%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −3483%	215 +3483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −11300%	110−120 +11300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −2517%	314 +2517%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−2220%

116
+2220%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	75−80
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −2500%	50−55 +2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −6400%	65 +6400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −4600%	45−50 +4600%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −4400%	45−50 +4400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	49

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2433%

76
+2433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	158 +0%	158 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	135 +0%	135 +0%
Metro Exodus	144 +0%	144 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

118

+0%

118

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	98 +0%	98 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Metro Exodus	112 +0%	112 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	222 +0%	222 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	126 +0%	126 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110 +0%	110 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	133 +0%	133 +0%

This is how GT 445M and RX 6800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is 2795% faster in 900p
RX 6800 XT is 538% faster in 1080p
RX 6800 XT is 3500% faster in 1440p
RX 6800 XT is 3000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800 XT is 11300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6800 XT is ahead in 54 tests (77%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.10	64.92
Recency	3 September 2010	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	300 Watt

GT 445M has 757.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, has a 2991.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 445M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 445M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.