Radeon R5 430 OEM vs GeForce GT 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 430 and Radeon R5 430 OEM, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 49 Watt
1.35

R5 430 OEM outperforms GT 430 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking986827
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.193.67
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGF108Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)30 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
CUDA cores per GPU96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors585 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.2018.72
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS0.599 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 - 28.8 GB/s36.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 430 1.35
R5 430 OEM 2.31
+71.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 430 602
R5 430 OEM 1031
+71.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Valorant 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−56.3%
50−55
+56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Valorant 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
Valorant 35−40
−57.1%
55−60
+57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−50%
21−24
+50%
Valorant 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Valorant 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.35 2.31
Recency 11 October 2010 30 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 50 Watt

GT 430 has 2% lower power consumption.

R5 430 OEM, on the other hand, has a 71.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R5 430 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430
AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1171 vote

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 404 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 430 or Radeon R5 430 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.