P106-090 vs GeForce GT 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 430 with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

GT 430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 49 Watt
1.55

P106-090 outperforms GT 430 by a whopping 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking963577
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.195.60
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF108GP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)31 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768
CUDA cores per GPU96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistors585 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.2073.49
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS2.352 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs1648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm250 mm
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 - 28.8 GB/s192.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVINo outputs
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 430 1.55
P106-090 6.07
+292%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 430 599
P106-090 2342
+291%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 430 2242
P106-090 21137
+843%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Hitman 3 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−267%
55−60
+267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−282%
130−140
+282%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 6.07
Recency 11 October 2010 31 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 75 Watt

GT 430 has 53.1% lower power consumption.

P106-090, on the other hand, has a 291.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 430 is a desktop card while P106-090 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1112 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 49 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.