Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce GT 430 PCI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963456
Core clock speed700 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors585 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate11.20432.0
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs16216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB28 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 October 2010 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 28 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 158 Watt

GT 430 PCI has 222.4% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 5500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 430 PCI and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 430 PCI is a desktop card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
GeForce GT 430 PCI
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.