ATI Radeon HD 4670 vs GeForce GT 320M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 320M with Radeon HD 4670, including specs and performance data.
ATI HD 4670 outperforms GT 320M by a whopping 274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1368 | 1123 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.01 |
| Power efficiency | 1.30 | 1.16 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | G96C | RV730 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 15 June 2009 (15 years ago) | 10 September 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $67 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | 514 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 59 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 8.000 | 24.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.08 TFLOPS | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 193 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−243%
|
24−27
+243%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−265%
|
95−100
+265%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−233%
|
40−45
+233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−243%
|
24−27
+243%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−265%
|
95−100
+265%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−233%
|
30−33
+233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−243%
|
24−27
+243%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−265%
|
95−100
+265%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−267%
|
55−60
+267%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 0.86 |
| Recency | 15 June 2009 | 10 September 2008 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 59 Watt |
GT 320M has an age advantage of 9 months, and 321.4% lower power consumption.
ATI HD 4670, on the other hand, has a 273.9% higher aggregate performance score.
The Radeon HD 4670 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 320M in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 320M is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4670 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
