Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce GT 220

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 220 and Radeon RX 6750 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 220
2009
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.57

RX 6750 XT outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 9381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking122453
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.97
Power efficiency0.6714.82
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT216Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (15 years ago)3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GT 220 and RX 6750 XT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482560
Core clock speed625 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors486 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.840416.0
Floating-point processing power0.1277 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/s432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 220 0.57
RX 6750 XT 54.04
+9381%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 220 219
RX 6750 XT 20769
+9384%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−690%
166
+690%
1440p0−186
4K0−149

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.81
−15.2%
3.31
+15.2%
1440pno data6.38
4Kno data11.20
  • RX 6750 XT has 15% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Atomic Heart 2−3
−12150%
245
+12150%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−2271%
166
+2271%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8150%
165
+8150%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−8700%
176
+8700%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1757%
130
+1757%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−6250%
127
+6250%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4700%
190−200
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%
Valorant 27−30
−882%
270−280
+882%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−5100%
104
+5100%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1457%
109
+1457%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1535%
270−280
+1535%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5350%
109
+5350%
Dota 2 10−12
−1300%
154
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4700%
190−200
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−6025%
245
+6025%
Valorant 27−30
−882%
270−280
+882%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−1271%
96
+1271%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4800%
98
+4800%
Dota 2 10−12
−1091%
131
+1091%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−4700%
190−200
+4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3275%
135
+3275%
Valorant 27−30
−882%
270−280
+882%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−35000%
350−400
+35000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 60
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−15300%
150−160
+15300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−5100%
100−110
+5100%
Fortnite 1−2
−13700%
130−140
+13700%
Atomic Heart 0−1 40−45
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−593%
104
+593%
Valorant 3−4
−9667%
290−300
+9667%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4000%
80−85
+4000%
Fortnite 2−3
−3500%
70−75
+3500%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 217
+0%
217
+0%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 170
+0%
170
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 186
+0%
186
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

This is how GT 220 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 690% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 35000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is ahead in 35 tests (56%)
  • there's a draw in 27 tests (44%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 54.04
Recency 12 October 2009 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 250 Watt

GT 220 has 331% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 9380.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1
810 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4
2730 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 220 or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.