Radeon RX 6600 XT vs GeForce GT 1030

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 1030 and Radeon RX 6600 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 1030
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
6.37

RX 6600 XT outperforms GT 1030 by a whopping 573% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking57691
Place by popularity3693
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.3163.03
Power efficiency14.5618.37
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP108Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 May 2017 (7 years ago)30 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $379

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6600 XT has 2629% better value for money than GT 1030.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1228 MHz1968 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz2589 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate35.23331.4
Floating-point processing power1.127 TFLOPS10.6 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 4.0 x8
Length145 mm190 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 1030 6.37
RX 6600 XT 42.87
+573%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 1030 2454
RX 6600 XT 16519
+573%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 1030 4728
RX 6600 XT 39051
+726%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 1030 20192
RX 6600 XT 88163
+337%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 1030 3625
RX 6600 XT 28342
+682%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 1030 22069
RX 6600 XT 156297
+608%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GT 1030 219163
RX 6600 XT 472371
+116%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−463%
135
+463%
1440p23
−226%
75
+226%
4K8
−450%
44
+450%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.292.81
1440p3.435.05
4K9.888.61

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 15
−427%
79
+427%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−400%
90−95
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−1513%
129
+1513%
Battlefield 5 22
−523%
130−140
+523%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−378%
85−90
+378%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−609%
78
+609%
Far Cry 5 21
−333%
90−95
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−289%
100−110
+289%
Forza Horizon 4 93
−114%
190−200
+114%
Hitman 3 16
−575%
108
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 152
−14.5%
170−180
+14.5%
Metro Exodus 26
−412%
130−140
+412%
Red Dead Redemption 2 31
−213%
95−100
+213%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
−330%
150−160
+330%
Watch Dogs: Legion 93
−43%
130−140
+43%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
−275%
90−95
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−1225%
106
+1225%
Battlefield 5 18−20
−661%
130−140
+661%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16
−438%
85−90
+438%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−986%
76
+986%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−550%
90−95
+550%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
−425%
100−110
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 84
−137%
190−200
+137%
Hitman 3 15
−620%
108
+620%
Horizon Zero Dawn 123
−41.5%
170−180
+41.5%
Metro Exodus 20
−565%
130−140
+565%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
−547%
95−100
+547%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−1000%
209
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−340%
85−90
+340%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
−58.3%
130−140
+58.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−838%
75
+838%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5
−1620%
85−90
+1620%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−590%
69
+590%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−550%
90−95
+550%
Forza Horizon 4 16
−1144%
190−200
+1144%
Hitman 3 12−14
−669%
100
+669%
Horizon Zero Dawn 19
−726%
157
+726%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−1044%
183
+1044%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−725%
99
+725%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
−917%
61
+917%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 19
−411%
95−100
+411%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−592%
80−85
+592%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−2700%
56
+2700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1233%
40
+1233%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−1075%
230−240
+1075%
Hitman 3 10−11
−570%
67
+570%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
−729%
116
+729%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−1533%
98
+1533%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−973%
118
+973%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1180%
60−65
+1180%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
−321%
200−210
+321%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−573%
70−75
+573%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Far Cry New Dawn 4
−825%
35−40
+825%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1000%
33
+1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1024%
190−200
+1024%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1767%
55−60
+1767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1700%
54
+1700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−833%
28
+833%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−833%
27−30
+833%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 14
Far Cry 5 3−4
−733%
24−27
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 7
−757%
60−65
+757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
−917%
61
+917%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1100%
24
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−457%
35−40
+457%

This is how GT 1030 and RX 6600 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600 XT is 463% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600 XT is 226% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6600 XT is 450% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600 XT is 2900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6600 XT surpassed GT 1030 in all 71 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.37 42.87
Recency 17 May 2017 30 July 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 160 Watt

GT 1030 has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6600 XT, on the other hand, has a 573% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1030 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Radeon RX 6600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7838 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4338 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.