ATI Radeon 9200 PRO vs GeForce G210M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1385	1602
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.71	no data
Architecture	Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	GT218	RV280
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 June 2009 (16 years ago)	1 May 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	no data
Core clock speed	625 MHz	239 MHz
Number of transistors	260 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	5.000	0.96
Floating-point processing power	0.048 TFLOPS	no data
Gigaflops	72	no data
ROPs	4	4
TMUs	8	4
L2 Cache	32 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	Up to 1 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 500 (DDR2), Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	164 MHz
Memory bandwidth	12.8 GB/s	5.248 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management

8.0

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	8.1
Shader Model	4.1	no data
OpenGL	2.1	1.4
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

16

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	15 June 2009	1 May 2003
Chip lithography	40 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	14 Watt	28 Watt