Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs GeForce G205M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1366not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.18no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameC79DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years ago)24 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164096
Core clock speed450 MHz1950 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors314 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600524.8
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS16.79 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 24 August 2022
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce G205M has 971.4% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Flex 170, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G205M and Data Center GPU Flex 170. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G205M is a notebook card while Data Center GPU Flex 170 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G205M
GeForce G205M
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 170
Data Center GPU Flex 170

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Flex 170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.