Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs GeForce G102M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | C79 | TU102 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 13 August 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $9,999 |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 4608 |
| CUDA cores | 16 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1620 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 260 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.600 | 466.6 |
| Floating-point performance | 0.0352 gflops | 14.93 gflops |
| Gigaflops | 48 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Bus support | PCI-E 1.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | Up to 512 MB | 48 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | VGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Power management | 8.0 | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 8 January 2009 | 13 August 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 14 Watt | 260 Watt |
GeForce G102M has 1757.1% lower power consumption.
RTX 8000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce G102M and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce G102M is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
