Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce FX Go5250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV34 A1Spectre SL
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)17 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed250 MHz626 MHz
Boost clock speedno data847 MHz
Number of transistors45 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data17 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00010.02
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3205 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (6.0)
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R5 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go5250 and Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5250
GeForce FX Go5250
AMD Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX Go5250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon R5 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.