ATI Radeon X300 vs GeForce FX Go 5200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1489not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameNV31MRV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 September 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5no data
Core clock speed1 MHz375 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data36 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.500
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR9.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 110 nm

ATI X300 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 36.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go 5200 and Radeon X300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5200 is a notebook card while Radeon X300 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
GeForce FX Go 5200
ATI Radeon X300
Radeon X300

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 17 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 32 votes

Rate Radeon X300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.