P104-101 vs GeForce FX Go 5200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1490not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV31MGP104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)5 January 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores52560
Core clock speed1 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1683 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm16 nm
Texture fill rateno data269.3
Floating-point processing powerno data8.617 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1251 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 5 January 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 16 nm

P104-101 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go 5200 and P104-101. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5200 is a notebook card while P104-101 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
GeForce FX Go 5200
NVIDIA P104-101
P104-101

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 18 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate P104-101 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.