Radeon RX 580X vs GeForce FX 5200

Place in the ranking	1493	325
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	6.21
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code name	NV18 C1	Polaris 20
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	6 March 2003 (21 year ago)	11 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$69.99	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	no data	2304
Core clock speed	250 MHz	1257 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1340 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	185 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.000	193.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	6.175 TFLOPS
ROPs	2	32
TMUs	4	144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	AGP 8x	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	200 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	6.4 GB/s	256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	1.3	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 5200 0.02

RX 580X 16.76
+83700%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5200 7

RX 580X 6458
+92157%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.02	16.76
Recency	6 March 2003	11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount	128 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	150 nm	14 nm

RX 580X has a 83700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 580X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.