Radeon R5 M250 vs GeForce FX 5200 Ultra
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1484 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Rankine (2003−2005) | GCN 1.0 (2011−2020) |
| GPU code name | NV34 A2 | Jet |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 March 2003 (21 year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 325 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 700 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 45 million | 690 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.300 | 14.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| TMUs | 4 | 20 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 8x | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 171 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 325 MHz | 1800 MBps |
| Memory bandwidth | 10.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | Portable Device Dependent |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0a | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.5 (5.1) |
| OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.1 (1.2) |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.170 |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 28 nm |
R5 M250 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5200 Ultra and Radeon R5 M250. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
