Mobility Radeon HD 550v vs GeForce 9800M GTS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTS and Mobility Radeon HD 550v, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9800M GTS
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 75 Watt
0.97
+26%

9800M GTS outperforms ATI Mobility HD 550v by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10781115
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTM96
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 July 2008 (15 years ago)5 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$230 $56

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64320
CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed600 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors505 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2014.40
Floating-point performance192 gflops288 gflops
Gigaflops240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9800M GTS and Mobility Radeon HD 550v compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GTS 0.97
+26%
ATI Mobility HD 550v 0.77

GeForce 9800M GTS outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 550v by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

9800M GTS 4060
+83.4%
ATI Mobility HD 550v 2214

GeForce 9800M GTS outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 550v by 83% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+20%
20
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 1−2 no data
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 no data

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 no data

This is how 9800M GTS and ATI Mobility HD 550v compete in popular games:

  • 9800M GTS is 20% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 0.77
Recency 15 July 2008 5 May 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 10 Watt

The GeForce 9800M GTS is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 550v in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 550v
Mobility Radeon HD 550v

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 42 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 550v on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.