UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTS SLI with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTS SLI
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
1.95

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms 9800M GTS SLI by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking894574
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Power efficiency0.9028.39
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128256
Core clock speed600 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GTS SLI 1.95
UHD Graphics 770 6.15
+215%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9800M GTS SLI 5663
+113%
UHD Graphics 770 2655

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−260%
18
+260%
4K4−5
−225%
13
+225%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10
+150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−110%
21−24
+110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−106%
35−40
+106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−80%
18
+80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−160%
12−14
+160%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+50%
12
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−60%
16
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−42.9%
50−55
+42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−325%
16−18
+325%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Hitman 3 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−255%
35−40
+255%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−120%
10−12
+120%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 3−4
Far Cry 5 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1

This is how 9800M GTS SLI and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 770 is 260% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 770 is 225% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9800M GTS SLI is 50% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9800M GTS SLI is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • UHD Graphics 770 is ahead in 51 test (75%)
  • there's a draw in 15 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.95 6.15
Recency 15 July 2008 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 55 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics 770 has a 215.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a notebook card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1224 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.