GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition vs 9800 GTX+
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800 GTX+ with GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.
GT 650M Mac Edition outperforms 9800 GTX+ by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1034 | 962 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.05 | no data |
Power efficiency | 0.63 | 2.46 |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
GPU code name | G92B | GK107 |
Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 12 July 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 738 MHz | 900 MHz |
Number of transistors | 754 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 141 Watt | 45 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 47.23 | 28.80 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.47 TFLOPS | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 16 | 16 |
TMUs | 64 | 32 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1254 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 70.4 GB/s | 80.26 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | HDTVDual Link DVI | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.28 | 1.59 |
Recency | 16 January 2009 | 12 July 2012 |
Chip lithography | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 141 Watt | 45 Watt |
GT 650M Mac Edition has a 24.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 213.3% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX+ in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 9800 GTX+ is a desktop card while GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.