Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce 9700M GTS
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9700M GTS and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms 9700M GTS by a whopping 1328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1177 | 450 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.82 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Xe LPG (2023) |
| GPU code name | G94 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 29 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 4 |
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1950 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1272 TFLOPS | no data |
| Gigaflops | 180 | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 24 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12_2 |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 1−2
−2400%
| 25
+2400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−85.7%
|
13
+85.7%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−57.1%
|
11
+57.1%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−1150%
|
50
+1150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−325%
|
30−35
+325%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−217%
|
90−95
+217%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
−700%
|
16
+700%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−85.7%
|
13
+85.7%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 18−20
−1321%
|
270−280
+1321%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−1317%
|
170−180
+1317%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−875%
|
39
+875%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−325%
|
30−35
+325%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−400%
|
24−27
+400%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−217%
|
90−95
+217%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−1317%
|
170−180
+1317%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−650%
|
30
+650%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−325%
|
30−35
+325%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1300%
|
70−75
+1300%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−217%
|
90−95
+217%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 3−4
−2333%
|
70−75
+2333%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 4−5
−1125%
|
45−50
+1125%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1050%
|
21−24
+1050%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−1400%
|
14−16
+1400%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
4K
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−33.3%
|
20−22
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−1275%
|
55−60
+1275%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1250%
|
27−30
+1250%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Atomic Heart | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Atomic Heart | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Atomic Heart | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
This is how 9700M GTS and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2400% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2333% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 24 tests (42%)
- there's a draw in 33 tests (58%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.71 | 10.14 |
| Recency | 29 July 2008 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 1328.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GTS in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
