GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs 9600M GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10064
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNB9P-GSGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)17 December 2021 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed120 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00073.92
Floating-point performance0.08 gflops4.731 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 30 Watt

9600M GT has 30.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600M GT and GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 97 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 110 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.