AeroBox GPU vs GeForce 9600M GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1278not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.07no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameG96CKryptos
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)13 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32896
Core clock speed120 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data985 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00055.16
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1066 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s68.22 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2008 13 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 100 Watt

9600M GT has 334.8% lower power consumption.

AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600M GT and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
GeForce 9600M GT
AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 98 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.