Radeon RX 6850 XT vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1125not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG94Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2008 (16 years ago)2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484608
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors505 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt325 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.60648.0
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs24288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s576.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTV1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 325 Watt

9600 GSO 512 has 261.1% lower power consumption.

RX 6850 XT, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and Radeon RX 6850 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
AMD Radeon RX 6850 XT
Radeon RX 6850 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 60 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 63 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6850 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.