Radeon HD 8210E vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600 GSO 512 with Radeon HD 8210E, including specs and performance data.

9600 GSO 512
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 90 Watt
0.85
+70%

9600 GSO 512 outperforms HD 8210E by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11291227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.663.87
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG94Kalindi
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2008 (16 years ago)23 April 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48128
Core clock speed650 MHz300 MHz
Number of transistors505 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt9 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.602.400
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS0.0768 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length229 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTVNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9600 GSO 512 0.85
+70%
HD 8210E 0.50

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600 GSO 512 329
+70.5%
HD 8210E 193

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.85 0.50
Recency 23 October 2008 23 April 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 9 Watt

9600 GSO 512 has a 70% higher aggregate performance score.

HD 8210E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8210E in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 8210E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
AMD Radeon HD 8210E
Radeon HD 8210E

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 60 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8210E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.