Radeon R2 Graphics vs GeForce 9500 GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1246not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.59no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameG96Beema
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (16 years ago)27 February 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$85.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32128
Core clock speed550 MHz351 MHz
Number of transistors314 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.6002.808
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.08986 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length175 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2)no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVISingle Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.3
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 27 February 2015
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

R2 Graphics has an age advantage of 6 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500 GT and Radeon R2 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
GeForce 9500 GT
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
Radeon R2 Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1234 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 455 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.