ION vs GeForce 945M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 945M and ION, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 945M
2015
2 GB DDR3, 75 Watt
5.27
+1852%

945M outperforms ION by a whopping 1852% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6261364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.970.95
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM107C7A-ION
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date27 October 2015 (9 years ago)3 June 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64016
Core clock speed928 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million282 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate40.803.600
Floating-point processing power1.306 TFLOPS0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs408

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 945M 5.27
+1852%
ION 0.27

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 945M 2108
+1852%
ION 108

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11 0−1
Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Valorant 60−65
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
+2100%
4−5
−2100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Fortnite 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11 0−1
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17 0−1
Valorant 60−65
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 0−1
Dota 2 40−45
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9 0−1
Valorant 60−65
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Fortnite 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7 0−1
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Valorant 55−60
+2750%
2−3
−2750%
Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Fortnite 10−11 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Valorant 24−27
+2500%
1−2
−2500%
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 18−20 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1

This is how GeForce 945M and ION compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 945M is 2600% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.27 0.27
Recency 27 October 2015 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 20 Watt

GeForce 945M has a 1851.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

ION, on the other hand, has 275% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 945M is our recommended choice as it beats the ION in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 945M
GeForce 945M
NVIDIA ION
ION

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
11 votes

Rate GeForce 945M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9
23 votes

Rate ION on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 945M or ION, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.