Radeon RX 6300M vs GeForce 940MX

Place in the ranking	702	330
Place by popularity	89	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.79	32.73
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GM107	Navi 24
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2016 (8 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	768
Core clock speed	795 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	861 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	27.55	115.2
Floating-point processing power	0.8817 TFLOPS	3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32
TMUs	32	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	32 Bit
Memory clock speed	1253 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	40.1 GB/s	72 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	2.0	no data
Optimus	+	-
GameWorks	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 940MX 3.94

RX 6300M 16.64
+322%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 940MX 1516

RX 6300M 6398
+322%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−312%

70−75
+312%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −164%	27−30 +164%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%
Elden Ring	9−10 −478%	50−55 +478%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −391%	50−55 +391%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −164%	27−30 +164%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −300%	65−70 +300%
Metro Exodus	11 −309%	45−50 +309%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
Valorant	6−7 −1017%	65−70 +1017%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	11 −391%	50−55 +391%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −164%	27−30 +164%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%
Dota 2	25 −140%	60−65 +140%
Elden Ring	9−10 −478%	50−55 +478%
Far Cry 5	26 −127%	55−60 +127%
Fortnite	16 −469%	90−95 +469%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −300%	65−70 +300%
Grand Theft Auto V	13 −354%	55−60 +354%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −463%	45−50 +463%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30 −290%	110−120 +290%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −208%	40−45 +208%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12 −325%	50−55 +325%
Valorant	6−7 −1017%	65−70 +1017%
World of Tanks	58 −259%	200−210 +259%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −391%	50−55 +391%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −164%	27−30 +164%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −313%	30−35 +313%
Dota 2	46 −30.4%	60−65 +30.4%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −195%	55−60 +195%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −300%	65−70 +300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10 −1070%	110−120 +1070%
Valorant	6−7 −1017%	65−70 +1017%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 −1150%	24−27 +1150%
Elden Ring	4−5 −550%	24−27 +550%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −733%	24−27 +733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −450%	150−160 +450%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%
World of Tanks	27−30 −311%	110−120 +311%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −580%	30−35 +580%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −333%	12−14 +333%
Far Cry 5	9−10 −367%	40−45 +367%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −925%	40−45 +925%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −3600%	35−40 +3600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Valorant	12−14 −250%	40−45 +250%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Elden Ring	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −75%	27−30 +75%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −345%	45−50 +345%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −75%	27−30 +75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −433%	16−18 +433%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Dota 2	16−18 −81.3%	27−30 +81.3%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −425%	21−24 +425%
Fortnite	3−4 −533%	18−20 +533%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1100%	24−27 +1100%
Valorant	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2

12−14

+0%

12−14

+0%

This is how GeForce 940MX and RX 6300M compete in popular games:

RX 6300M is 312% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6300M is 3600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6300M is ahead in 60 tests (95%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.94	16.64
Recency	28 June 2016	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	35 Watt

GeForce 940MX has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 52.2% lower power consumption.

RX 6300M, on the other hand, has a 322.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 940MX in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.