Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9100M G 9100M G mGPU AMD 9100M G mGPU Intel 9200M 9200M GS 9200M GS GDDR3 9300M G 9300M GS 9300M GS DDR2 9300M GS GDDR3 9400M 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M G 9400M GeForceBoost 9500M G 9500M GE 9500M GS 9600M GS 9600M GT 9600M GT Mac Edition 9650M GS 9650M GT 9700M GT 9700M GTS 9800M GS 9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI 9800S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300 XT 6400 6500 XT 6600 6600 LE 6600 XT 6650 XT 6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT 6800 6800 3456SP 6800 XT 6850 XT 6900 6900 XT 6950 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

9400M (G) / ION (LE)
2008
12 Watt
0.29

6650 XT outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 14014% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
RX 6650 XT RX 6650 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1396112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data56.66
Power efficiency1.8617.91
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMCP79MXNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)10 May 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed450 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2635 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rateno data337.3
Floating-point processing powerno data10.79 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2190 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data280.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 0.29
RX 6650 XT 40.93
+14014%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 607
RX 6650 XT 105955
+17356%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1138
1440p-0−169
4K-0−136

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.89
1440pno data5.78
4Kno data11.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−12700%
128
+12700%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−10700%
108
+10700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
Valorant 24−27
−812%
230−240
+812%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2046%
270−280
+2046%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8700%
88
+8700%
Dota 2 9−10
−1800%
171
+1800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−3540%
182
+3540%
Valorant 24−27
−812%
230−240
+812%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
Dota 2 9−10
−1411%
136
+1411%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5200%
150−160
+5200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2186%
160−170
+2186%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2040%
107
+2040%
Valorant 24−27
−812%
230−240
+812%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−3500%
108
+3500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 0−1 290−300
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−11900%
120−130
+11900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−7900%
80−85
+7900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−414%
72
+414%
Valorant 1−2
−25100%
250−260
+25100%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−5700%
55−60
+5700%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2650%
55−60
+2650%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 225
+0%
225
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 342
+0%
342
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 198
+0%
198
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 181
+0%
181
+0%
Far Cry 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180
+0%
180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 147
+0%
147
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 77
+0%
77
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Far Cry 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 25100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT performs better in 26 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.29 40.93
Recency 14 October 2008 10 May 2022
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 176 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 1367% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 14014% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
HD 6310 Radeon HD 6310
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
vs
TITAN V TITAN V
9400M (G) / ION (LE) GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
Go 7600 GeForce Go 7600
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
RX 5900 RX 5900
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
Zhongshan Subor Z+ GPU Subor Z+ GPU
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
RTX 3060 Max-Q RTX 3060 Max-Q
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
RTX A4500 RTX A4500
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
R9 390X2 R9 390X2
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
Arc 7 A770M 7 A770M
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
PRO W7900 PRO W7900
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
9400M (G) / ION (LE) NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 4127 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon RX 6650 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.