GeForce 810M vs 930MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 930MX and GeForce 810M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 930MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 17 Watt
3.33
+214%

930MX outperforms 810M by a whopping 214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7391093
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.434.84
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM108GF117
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2016 (8 years ago)24 March 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speed952 MHz738 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHz950 MHz
Number of transistorsno data585 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.485.904
Floating-point processing power0.7834 TFLOPS0.1417 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs248

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 930MX 3.33
+214%
GeForce 810M 1.06

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 930MX 1285
+216%
GeForce 810M 407

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 930MX 5525
+236%
GeForce 810M 1644

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
+275%
4−5
−275%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8
+300%
2−3
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Hitman 3 8
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Metro Exodus 15
+275%
4−5
−275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+225%
4−5
−225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Metro Exodus 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10
+233%
3−4
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+244%
9−10
−244%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
+233%
3−4
−233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+500%
1−2
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

This is how GeForce 930MX and GeForce 810M compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 930MX is 275% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.33 1.06
Recency 1 March 2016 24 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce 930MX has a 214.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce 810M, on the other hand, has 13.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 930MX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 810M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930MX
NVIDIA GeForce 810M
GeForce 810M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 386 votes

Rate GeForce 930MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 506 votes

Rate GeForce 810M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.