Radeon HD 7770M vs GeForce 920MX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 920MX and Radeon HD 7770M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 920MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 16 Watt
2.80

HD 7770M outperforms 920MX by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking797729
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.007.33
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGM108Chelsea
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 March 2016 (8 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256512
Core clock speed965 MHz675 MHz
Boost clock speed993 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate23.8321.60
Floating-point processing power0.5084 TFLOPS0.6912 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920MX 2.80
HD 7770M 3.42
+22.1%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 920MX 1835
HD 7770M 2110
+15%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 920MX 7408
HD 7770M 10468
+41.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−13.6%
24−27
+13.6%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−13.6%
24−27
+13.6%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+53.3%
14−16
−53.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry 5 6
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Hitman 3 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−13.6%
24−27
+13.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−7.9%
40−45
+7.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 1−2
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1

This is how GeForce 920MX and HD 7770M compete in popular games:

  • HD 7770M is 17% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 920MX is 53% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7770M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 920MX is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
  • HD 7770M is ahead in 51 test (82%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.80 3.42
Recency 25 March 2016 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 32 Watt

GeForce 920MX has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 100% lower power consumption.

HD 7770M, on the other hand, has a 22.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon HD 7770M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920MX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920MX
GeForce 920MX
AMD Radeon HD 7770M
Radeon HD 7770M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1067 votes

Rate GeForce 920MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.