UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce 920M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 920M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 920M
2015
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.87

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs outperforms 920M by a whopping 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking907670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.05no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGK208BTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed954 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate30.53no data
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920M 1.87
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 4.31
+130%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 920M 1719
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 3322
+93.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 920M 1162
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 2493
+115%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 920M 7242
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 12523
+72.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−6.7%
16
+6.7%
4K9
−100%
18−21
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−367%
14
+367%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Hitman 3 6−7
−167%
16
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−225%
13
+225%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1500%
16
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−333%
13
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Hitman 3 6−7
−100%
12
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+0%
4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−77.8%
16−18
+77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+0%
16−18
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−300%
12
+300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Hitman 3 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−106%
35−40
+106%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−100%
18−20
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−325%
16−18
+325%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−125%
9−10
+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 11
+0%
11
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9
+0%
9
+0%
Metro Exodus 6
+0%
6
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GeForce 920M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 7% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce 920M is 25% faster.
  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce 920M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is ahead in 31 test (55%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (43%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.87 4.31
Recency 13 March 2015 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 130.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1275 votes

Rate GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.