Radeon RX 6650 XT vs GeForce 920M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 920M with Radeon RX 6650 XT, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 920M
2015
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.86

RX 6650 XT outperforms 920M by a whopping 2298% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking91078
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data62.47
Power efficiency3.9317.67
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK208BNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed954 MHz2055 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2635 MHz
Number of transistors915 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53337.3
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s280.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920M 1.86
RX 6650 XT 44.61
+2298%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 920M 719
RX 6650 XT 17208
+2293%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 920M 1719
RX 6650 XT 41739
+2329%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 920M 5587
RX 6650 XT 105955
+1796%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 920M 1162
RX 6650 XT 29796
+2465%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 920M 7242
RX 6650 XT 167944
+2219%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 920M 90619
RX 6650 XT 451929
+399%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−775%
140
+775%
1440p2−3
−3200%
66
+3200%
4K9
−311%
37
+311%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.85
1440pno data6.05
4Kno data10.78

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3100%
128
+3100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−14200%
140−150
+14200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1680%
85−90
+1680%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2600%
108
+2600%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2080%
100−110
+2080%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2800%
200−210
+2800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1500%
95−100
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−965%
180−190
+965%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1767%
160−170
+1767%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−289%
130−140
+289%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
−527%
90−95
+527%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−14200%
140−150
+14200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1680%
85−90
+1680%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2100%
88
+2100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2080%
100−110
+2080%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2800%
200−210
+2800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1500%
95−100
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−965%
180−190
+965%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2367%
222
+2367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−441%
90−95
+441%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−289%
130−140
+289%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1680%
85−90
+1680%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1850%
78
+1850%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2800%
200−210
+2800%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1500%
95−100
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−918%
173
+918%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2044%
193
+2044%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−2575%
107
+2575%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−85.7%
65
+85.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2833%
85−90
+2833%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2200%
65−70
+2200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%
Hitman 3 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−2050%
129
+2050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6700%
65−70
+6700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−1960%
200−210
+1960%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1440%
75−80
+1440%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1500%
30−35
+1500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 30−33
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 23

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 124
+0%
124
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+0%
64
+0%

This is how GeForce 920M and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 775% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 3200% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 311% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 14200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 44.61
Recency 13 March 2015 10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 176 Watt

GeForce 920M has 433.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6650 XT, on the other hand, has a 2298.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 920M is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1283 votes

Rate GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3319 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.