Radeon Pro W6600M vs GeForce 920M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 920M with Radeon Pro W6600M, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 920M
2015
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.86

Pro W6600M outperforms 920M by a whopping 1229% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking915224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.8718.84
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK208BNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841792
Core clock speed954 MHz1224 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2034 MHz
Number of transistors915 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53227.8
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS7.29 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920M 1.86
Pro W6600M 24.72
+1229%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 920M 718
Pro W6600M 9521
+1226%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−1167%
190−200
+1167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−11300%
110−120
+11300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1320%
70−75
+1320%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2500%
75−80
+2500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2486%
180−190
+2486%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2025%
85−90
+2025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1300%
120−130
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−249%
120−130
+249%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
−400%
75−80
+400%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−11300%
110−120
+11300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1320%
70−75
+1320%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2500%
75−80
+2500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1660%
85−90
+1660%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2486%
180−190
+2486%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2025%
85−90
+2025%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1300%
120−130
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−329%
70−75
+329%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−249%
120−130
+249%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1320%
70−75
+1320%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2500%
75−80
+2500%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2486%
180−190
+2486%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1133%
70−75
+1133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−782%
150−160
+782%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1300%
120−130
+1300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−1725%
70−75
+1725%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−249%
120−130
+249%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2025%
85−90
+2025%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2133%
65−70
+2133%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1700%
50−55
+1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−3700%
35−40
+3700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Hitman 3 7−8
−529%
40−45
+529%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−4800%
45−50
+4800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−1690%
170−180
+1690%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1100%
60−65
+1100%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1050%
21−24
+1050%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 21−24
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1900%
20−22
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 16−18

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−933%
30−35
+933%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how GeForce 920M and Pro W6600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 1167% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro W6600M is 11300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 24.72
Recency 13 March 2015 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 90 Watt

GeForce 920M has 172.7% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600M, on the other hand, has a 1229% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 920M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M
AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1327 votes

Rate GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.