GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs 920M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 920M and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 920M
2015
4 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.86

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms 920M by a whopping 1916% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking915123
Place by popularitynot in top-10054
Power efficiency3.8651.42
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK208BAD107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842560
Core clock speed954 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53140.4
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3280
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 920M 1.86
RTX 4050 Mobile 37.50
+1916%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 920M 718
RTX 4050 Mobile 14451
+1913%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GeForce 920M 1719
RTX 4050 Mobile 30465
+1673%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GeForce 920M 5587
RTX 4050 Mobile 85660
+1433%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 920M 1162
RTX 4050 Mobile 22400
+1829%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 920M 7242
RTX 4050 Mobile 134084
+1751%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GeForce 920M 90619
RTX 4050 Mobile 552112
+509%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GeForce 920M 329
RTX 4050 Mobile 8331
+2432%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD15
−533%
95
+533%
1440p2−3
−2300%
48
+2300%
4K1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2475%
103
+2475%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1086%
80−85
+1086%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−12500%
120−130
+12500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1975%
83
+1975%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1840%
95−100
+1840%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2629%
190−200
+2629%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−859%
160−170
+859%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1489%
140−150
+1489%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−266%
120−130
+266%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
−453%
80−85
+453%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−12500%
120−130
+12500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1675%
71
+1675%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1840%
95−100
+1840%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2629%
190−200
+2629%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−859%
160−170
+859%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1767%
168
+1767%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−376%
80−85
+376%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−266%
120−130
+266%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1086%
80−85
+1086%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−1480%
75−80
+1480%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1525%
65
+1525%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2733%
85−90
+2733%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−2629%
190−200
+2629%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−859%
160−170
+859%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−1511%
145
+1511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−1900%
80
+1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−48.6%
52
+48.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2175%
90−95
+2175%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3500%
36
+3500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−629%
50−55
+629%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−1820%
190−200
+1820%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−1240%
65−70
+1240%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−3200%
30−35
+3200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 24−27
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 26

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 117
+0%
117
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+0%
92
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70
+0%
70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 84
+0%
84
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+0%
47
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+0%
53
+0%

This is how GeForce 920M and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 533% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 2300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 3000% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4050 Mobile is 12500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.86 37.50
Recency 13 March 2015 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 920M has 51.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1916.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920M
GeForce 920M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1320 votes

Rate GeForce 920M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2768 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.