Radeon R9 370X vs GeForce 920A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking940not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.60no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK208BTrinidad
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)27 August 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841280
Core clock speed954 MHz980 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors915 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate30.5382.40
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS2.637 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3280
L1 Cache32 KB384 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data221 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 27 August 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 180 Watt

GeForce 920A has 445% lower power consumption.

R9 370X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 920A and Radeon R9 370X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 920A is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 370X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate GeForce 920A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 92 votes

Rate Radeon R9 370X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920A or Radeon R9 370X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.