Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce 9200M GS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9200M GS with Radeon RX 7900 XT, including specs and performance data.

9200M GS
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.31

RX 7900 XT outperforms 9200M GS by a whopping 24158% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131814
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.78
Power efficiency1.6317.18
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG98Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)3 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores85376
Core clock speed550 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2394 MHz
Number of transistors210 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400804.4
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS51.48 TFLOPS
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs4192
TMUs8336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9200M GS 0.31
RX 7900 XT 75.20
+24158%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9200M GS 121
RX 7900 XT 28977
+23848%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9200M GS 373
RX 7900 XT 142489
+38152%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1205
1440p0−1133
4K-0−186

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.39
1440pno data6.76
4Kno data10.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−11750%
237
+11750%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5000%
150−160
+5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−10500%
212
+10500%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3250%
260−270
+3250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−7900%
300−350
+7900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5000%
150−160
+5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−9400%
190
+9400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−3250%
260−270
+3250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−12200%
492
+12200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1700%
160−170
+1700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−5000%
150−160
+5000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8850%
179
+8850%
Hitman 3 4−5
−3125%
120−130
+3125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−4275%
350
+4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−10500%
424
+10500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−2844%
265
+2844%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−446%
150−160
+446%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 122
Hitman 3 6−7
−1717%
100−110
+1717%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−13750%
277
+13750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5900%
120−130
+5900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6200%
60−65
+6200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 60−65

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4100%
80−85
+4100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Metro Exodus 141
+0%
141
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 325
+0%
325
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 159
+0%
159
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
+0%
173
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 13750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 75.20
Recency 3 June 2008 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 300 Watt

9200M GS has 2207.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has a 24158.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 28 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1794 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.