GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs 9200M GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated6
Place by popularitynot in top-10077
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data48.82
Power efficiencyno data20.18
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG98AD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores87680
Core clock speed550 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2610 MHz
Number of transistors210 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400626.4
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS40.09 TFLOPS
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs480
TMUs8240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data285 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9200M GS 121
RTX 4070 Ti 31830
+26206%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9200M GS 373
RTX 4070 Ti 135624
+36309%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 285 Watt

9200M GS has 2092.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 28 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6911 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.