HD Graphics vs GeForce 910M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 910M with HD Graphics, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 910M
2015
DDR3 MB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.32
+97%

910M outperforms HD Graphics by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9891169
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Power efficiency3.171.52
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameGK208BIvy Bridge GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (10 years ago)1 April 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38448
Core clock speed641 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors915 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate20.516.300
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPS0.1008 TFLOPS
ROPs81
TMUs326

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1001 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.0
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.80
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 910M 1.32
+97%
HD Graphics 0.67

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 910M 588
+96.7%
HD Graphics 299

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GeForce 910M 1022
+241%
HD Graphics 300

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
+125%
4−5
−125%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+114%
14−16
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+119%
16−18
−119%
Fortnite 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Valorant 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Valorant 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

This is how GeForce 910M and HD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GeForce 910M is 125% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.32 0.67
Recency 13 March 2015 1 April 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 35 Watt

GeForce 910M has a 97% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 6.1% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics, on the other hand, has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 910M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 910M is a notebook card while HD Graphics is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
Intel HD Graphics
HD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4
60 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4
2399 votes

Rate HD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 910M or HD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.