ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce 9100M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14241552
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHRS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores82
Core clock speed450 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speedno data180 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.37
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX107.0
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9100M G 68
+3300%
ATI IGP 340M 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the 9100M G is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9100M G is ahead in 13 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 5 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

9100M G has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G
GeForce 9100M G
ATI Radeon IGP 340M
Radeon IGP 340M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.