Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs GeForce 8800M GTX

Place in the ranking	1055	528
Place by popularity	not in top-100	65
Power efficiency	1.27	18.62
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	G92	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 November 2007 (17 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	80
Core clock speed	500 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1350 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.24 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	48	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12_1
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTX 1.20

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 7.58
+532%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8800M GTX 3422

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs 21729
+535%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −533%	19 +533%
1440p	1−2 −900%	10 +900%
4K	2−3 −750%	17 +750%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−367%

14
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −333%	13 +333%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −207%	40−45 +207%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −93.8%	62 +93.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Hitman 3	6−7 −150%	15 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −207%	40−45 +207%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −900%	20−22 +900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −200%	24 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −100%	21−24 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −53.1%	49 +53.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8 +167%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −4800%	45−50 +4800%
Hitman 3	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −14.3%	16 +14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −150%	20 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +0%	11 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−900%

20−22
+900%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	7−8
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Hitman 3	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	10
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−225%

12−14
+225%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

5−6

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−250%

7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +0%	19 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	38 +0%	38 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16 +0%	16 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	27 +0%	27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +0%	16 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how 8800M GTX and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 533% faster in 1080p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 900% faster in 1440p
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 750% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is 4800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is ahead in 46 tests (69%)
there's a draw in 21 test (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.20	7.58
Recency	1 November 2007	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	28 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs has a 531.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 132.1% lower power consumption.

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.