Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking949not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.13no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTXSpectre SL
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)17 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192192
Core clock speed500 MHz533 MHz
Boost clock speedno data655 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt17 Watt
Texture fill rateno data6.396
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2047 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 17 September 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 17 Watt

R4 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 6 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 664.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 58 votes

Rate Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTX SLI or Radeon R4 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.