Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX SLI with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.
PRO W7700 outperforms 8800M GTX SLI by a whopping 2367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 876 | 61 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 55.87 |
Power efficiency | 1.11 | 18.73 |
Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024) |
GPU code name | NB8E-GTX | Navi 32 |
Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 19 November 2007 (16 years ago) | 13 November 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 3072 |
Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2600 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1508 Million | 28,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 190 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 499.2 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 31.95 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 96 |
TMUs | no data | 192 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 241 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 576.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 10 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 2.2 |
Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2275%
|
95−100
+2275%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
−2329%
|
170−180
+2329%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−2300%
|
120−130
+2300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2275%
|
95−100
+2275%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−2233%
|
70−75
+2233%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−2300%
|
120−130
+2300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2275%
|
190−200
+2275%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
−2329%
|
170−180
+2329%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
−2122%
|
400−450
+2122%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−2275%
|
95−100
+2275%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−2300%
|
240−250
+2300%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−2329%
|
850−900
+2329%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
−2329%
|
170−180
+2329%
|
Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−2300%
|
120−130
+2300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2275%
|
95−100
+2275%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−2233%
|
70−75
+2233%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−2300%
|
120−130
+2300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2275%
|
190−200
+2275%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
−2329%
|
170−180
+2329%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
−2122%
|
400−450
+2122%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−2275%
|
95−100
+2275%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−2300%
|
240−250
+2300%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−2317%
|
290−300
+2317%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−2329%
|
850−900
+2329%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
−2329%
|
170−180
+2329%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−2300%
|
120−130
+2300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−2275%
|
95−100
+2275%
|
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−2233%
|
70−75
+2233%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−2275%
|
190−200
+2275%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
−2329%
|
170−180
+2329%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
−2122%
|
400−450
+2122%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−2300%
|
240−250
+2300%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−2317%
|
290−300
+2317%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−2329%
|
850−900
+2329%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−2275%
|
95−100
+2275%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−2233%
|
70−75
+2233%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−2233%
|
70−75
+2233%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
−2150%
|
45−50
+2150%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−2150%
|
45−50
+2150%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
−2329%
|
170−180
+2329%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
−2233%
|
140−150
+2233%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
−2355%
|
270−280
+2355%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−2300%
|
120−130
+2300%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
−2150%
|
45−50
+2150%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2300%
|
24−27
+2300%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−2233%
|
70−75
+2233%
|
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 2.02 | 49.83 |
Recency | 19 November 2007 | 13 November 2023 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 16 GB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 190 Watt |
8800M GTX SLI has 46.2% lower power consumption.
PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 2366.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.