Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX SLI with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

8800M GTX SLI
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
2.02

PRO W7700 outperforms 8800M GTX SLI by a whopping 2367% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking87661
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.87
Power efficiency1.1118.73
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTXNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date19 November 2007 (16 years ago)13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923072
Core clock speed500 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rateno data499.2
Floating-point processing powerno data31.95 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−2122%
400−450
+2122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−2300%
240−250
+2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−2329%
850−900
+2329%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−2122%
400−450
+2122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−2300%
240−250
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2317%
290−300
+2317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−2329%
850−900
+2329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−2122%
400−450
+2122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−2300%
240−250
+2300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2317%
290−300
+2317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−2329%
850−900
+2329%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 7−8
−2329%
170−180
+2329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
−2355%
270−280
+2355%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.02 49.83
Recency 19 November 2007 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 190 Watt

8800M GTX SLI has 46.2% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 2366.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.