Radeon RX 7600S vs GeForce 8800M GTS

Place in the ranking	1111	121
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.37	35.67
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	G92	Navi 33
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 November 2007 (17 years ago)	4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	1792
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	246.4
Floating-point processing power	0.16 TFLOPS	15.77 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	64
TMUs	32	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-HE	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	1.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTS 0.95

RX 7600S 37.10
+3805%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800M GTS 382

RX 7600S 14940
+3811%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8800M GTS 2552

RX 7600S 79339
+3009%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	2−3 −4900%	100 +4900%
1440p	1−2 −4800%	49 +4800%
4K	0−1	26

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −1314%	99 +1314%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1975%	80−85 +1975%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −1143%	87 +1143%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −1200%	52 +1200%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2750%	228 +2750%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1167%	75−80 +1167%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −971%	75 +971%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −950%	42 +950%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −460%	56 +460%
Fortnite	3−4 −5567%	170−180 +5567%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −2275%	190 +2275%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1567%	200−210 +1567%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1167%	75−80 +1167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −2183%	130−140 +2183%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1113%	270−280 +1113%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −886%	69 +886%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −775%	35 +775%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −870%	95−100 +870%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1938%	163 +1938%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −1567%	200−210 +1567%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −3140%	160−170 +3140%
World of Tanks	5−6 −4840%	240−250 +4840%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −600%	21 +600%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2400%	120−130 +2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −1575%	65−70 +1575%
Valorant	6−7 −1917%	120−130 +1917%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Dota 2	14−16 −407%	75−80 +407%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −407%	75−80 +407%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −4100%	120−130 +4100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	24−27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −407%	75−80 +407%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −4400%	45−50 +4400%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −10%	11 +10%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −350%	9 +350%
Dota 2	14−16 −407%	75−80 +407%
Far Cry 5	0−1	55−60
Valorant	1−2 −6300%	60−65 +6300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	91 +0%	91 +0%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Valorant	209 +0%	209 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Dota 2	122 +0%	122 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	126 +0%	126 +0%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Valorant	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Dota 2	110 +0%	110 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	83 +0%	83 +0%
Valorant	179 +0%	179 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Metro Exodus	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

30−35

+0%

30−35

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

This is how 8800M GTS and RX 7600S compete in popular games:

RX 7600S is 4900% faster in 1080p
RX 7600S is 4800% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600S is 6300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 7600S is ahead in 36 tests (59%)
there's a draw in 25 tests (41%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.95	37.10
Recency	1 November 2007	4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	75 Watt

8800M GTS has 50% lower power consumption.

RX 7600S, on the other hand, has a 3805.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTS in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.