GeForce 405M vs 8800 Ultra

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking939not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.68no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG80GT218
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 May 2007 (17 years ago)5 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61216
Core clock speed612 MHz606 MHz
Number of transistors681 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate39.174.848
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPS0.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs244
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1080 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 API
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.34.5
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2007 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 14 Watt

GeForce 405M has an age advantage of 3 years, a 125% more advanced lithography process, and 1121.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 Ultra and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop card while GeForce 405M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GeForce 8800 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 29 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 16 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.