HD Graphics 400 vs GeForce 8800 GTX

Place in the ranking	966	1070
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.02	no data
Power efficiency	0.69	13.10
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	G80	Braswell GT1
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	8 November 2006 (17 years ago)	1 April 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$599	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	575	96
Core clock speed	576 MHz	320 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	640 MHz
Number of transistors	681 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	155 Watt	6 Watt
Texture fill rate	36.86	7.680
Floating-point processing power	0.3456 TFLOPS	0.1229 TFLOPS
ROPs	24	2
TMUs	32	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x1
Length	270 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	DDR3L
Maximum RAM amount	768 MB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	3.3	4.3
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.80
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.53	1.13
Recency	8 November 2006	1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount	768 MB	8 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	155 Watt	6 Watt

8800 GTX has a 35.4% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 2483.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8800 GTX is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.