Radeon RX Vega 3 vs GeForce 8800 GTS 640

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated775
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Power efficiencyno data13.73
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG80Picasso
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 November 2006 (18 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96192
Core clock speed513 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1001 MHz
Number of transistors681 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.6212.01
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPS0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs204
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount640 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed792 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2006 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 143 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 853.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 640 and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
GeForce 8800 GTS 640
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3
Radeon RX Vega 3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 45 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1952 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.