GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 vs 8800 GTS 640

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG80GA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 November 2006 (18 years ago)1 September 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 $329

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores963584
Core clock speed513 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1777 MHz
Number of transistors681 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)143 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate24.62199.0
Floating-point processing power0.2281 TFLOPS12.74 TFLOPS
ROPs2048
TMUs24112
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm242 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount640 MB12 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed792 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.36 GB/s360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2006 1 September 2021
Maximum RAM amount 640 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 143 Watt 170 Watt

8800 GTS 640 has 18.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 12 GB GA104, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1820% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTS 640 and GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
GeForce 8800 GTS 640
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104
GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 45 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1699 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.